Rolling Stones In Mono (Box)

Product Information

To hear how some of it can sound, the 12" 45 rpm single reissue last year of "Satisfaction" with "Under Assistant promo guy" and "Spider and the Fly" shows that this stuff can sound pretty good, though you can't get away from the fact that Satisfaction just is not a good recording. That chopped off "RCA sound"... Grow, Kory (10 August 2016). "Massive Rolling Stones Mono Box Set for Release". Rolling Stone . Retrieved 18 December 2016.

theme_alert": "Venta únicamente en méxico. Hacemos nuestro mejor esfuerzo para entregar su pedido a tiempo, sin embargo, puede haber retrasos mientras intentamos mantener a todos a salvo.", Offiziellecharts.de – The Rolling Stones – The Rolling Stones in Mono" (in German). GfK Entertainment Charts. Retrieved 27 January 2023. The Rolling Stones in Mono (Limited Color Edition) was mastered by GRAMMY® award-winning engineer Bob Ludwig at Gateway Mastering. For the project he utilized Direct Stream Digital (DSD) transfers from the original master recordings, with a sampling rate of 2,822,400. Lacquer cutting for vinyl was performed at Abbey Road Studios by Sean Magee. The Rolling Stones in Mono (Limited Color Edition) project has been overseen by Teri Landi, ABKCO’s GRAMMY ® award-winning Chief Audio Engineer. By the second record, they were recording and paying homage at Chess, Chicago and at RCA in Hollywood. On December’s Children (and everybody’s) engineering credits go to Dave Hassinger (Hollywood), Ron Malo (Chicago) and Glyn Johns (London). Starting with Between the Buttons, the group settled in at Olympic for the rest of their time with Decca Records.

Customer reviews

However, The Rolling Stones in the 1960s was a band that played live in the studio and depended upon microphone distance and instrument placement for a good mix more than they depended upon getting it right in the mix. Box Set, Compilation, Limited Edition; CD, Album, Reissue, Remastered, Mono , SHM-CD, Mini-LP Sleeve; CD, Album, Reissue, Remastered, Mono , SHM-CD, Mini-LP Sleeve; CD, Album, Reissue, Remastered, Mono , SHM-CD, Mini-LP Sleeve; CD, Album, Reissue, Remastered, Mono , SHM-CD, Mini-LP Sleeve; CD, Album, Reissue, Remastered, Mono , SHM-CD, Mini-LP Sleeve; CD, Album, Reissue, Remastered, Mono , SHM-CD, Mini-LP Sleeve; CD, Album, Reissue, Remastered, Mono , SHM-CD, Mini-LP Sleeve; CD, Album, Reissue, Remastered, Mono , SHM-CD, Mini-LP Sleeve; CD, Album, Reissue, Remastered, Mono , SHM-CD, Mini-LP Sleeve; CD, Album, Reissue, Remastered, Mono , SHM-CD, Mini-LP Sleeve; CD, Compilation, Reissue, Remastered, Mono , SHM-CD, Mini-LP Sleeve; CD, Album, Reissue, Remastered, Mono , SHM-CD, Mini-LP Sleeve; CD, Album, Reissue, Remastered, Mono , SHM-CD, Mini-LP Sleeve; CD, Album, Reissue, Remastered, Mono , SHM-CD, Mini-LP Sleeve; CD, Compilation, Remastered, Mono , SHM-CD, Mini-LP Sleeve

For CDs with printed/picture label (EOMS, Dirty Work, Steel Wheels, Voodoo Lounge, Bridges to Babylon, A Bigger Bang) there is an extra ‘silver’ ring on the label side around the hub. The visualization would essentially be below. The illustration represents 2 cables merging into 1 RCA, then 1 RCA splitting to 2 again to the preamp.The reason that digital mastering is preferable to just transferring the tape itself onto vinyl is because you have to correct many small (and larger) faults that have developed on the tape over the years as well as basic issues such as multiple tape alignments. Digital mastering can isolate and pin-point rogue frequencies and small errors. Try doing the same on a tape and not only will your error (hopefully) be fixed but that same ‘fix’ will occur across the entire frequency band over a wide area, causing problems before and after the ‘error’ causing, in effect, new errors. Hence, digital mastering was essential. SOUND TESTS In fact EMI had an employee whose only job was to play test pressings on all of the “kiddie phonographs” of the day to be sure they would play without skipping. Those that did were labeled (for obvious reasons) “kangaroo cuts” and new lacquers had to be cut with less bass and perhaps less dynamic range. Since the recordings are identical, you’d think the two box sets would be equal. This is where cutting, pressing and vinyl quality affect LPs. Although, SHM-CD logo is printed on the hub, the catalog number, SID mastering code and Universal logo are present in the inner mirror band of the CD the fonts that are used are different from official. Also, the CD shape is different from those that are pressed in Japan.

Of course if you’ve not done so I invite you to listen to the Analog Planet Stones Comparison Radio Show. Nonetheless, almost everything was recorded in one studio by but a few engineers and all of the tapes were stored in Abbey Road’s lower level vault where they remain to this day. Matrix / Runout (Side AC (8 in # 2098-1 covers a 7)): 7120981-A-1 SELECTION # 2098-1 245546E1 1266765 00018771209812-A As I write this, the YouTube video you can watch and listen to below has attracted many comments and people seem to like the original of “Play With Fire” over the reissue. I completely disagree! One person said the reissue sounds “muddy”. Yes if your system can’t cope with the prodigious bass and others think it sounds “cloudy”. I can only tell you that in my system and to my ears, overall the reissues have far wider dynamic range, much better bass, greater transparency and are overall much better. You can also listen to the high resolution files here: So groups like The Beatles and The Rolling Stones—as well as their producers, engineers and manager—were far more concerned about the mono mixes than they were about the slapdash stereo mixes produced later, often without the group’s participation. This was also true of Bob Dylan, who after attending the mono mixing sessions of “Blonde On Blonde” left Nashville, leaving to others the stereo mixing chores. Of course in the case of The Rolling Stones, the early albums were never released in “stereo”.

Tracklist

Despite the fact that almost all the tapes used in the box set were first generation, sometimes, you have no choice in the matter because it’s the only and/or best source (sometimes later generation sources sound better than first generation because the ‘first’ is in a relatively poor condition or somesuch). Even if a second generation tape has been used (and most of the sources in this box were first) then the second generation tape was an original source tape.”